Thanks! Octoat 11:22:00 AM EST Anonymous said. Octoat 1:38:00 PM EST Unknown said.Ĭould you please run a comparison against MIK 5? I own and love your software, but I am very curious to see if MIK 5 has managed to close the gap in terms of accuracy. That said, if you know of a good reference set, I'd be more than happy to run the test and post the numbers. And as long as that's not available, anybody who claims to do really well on dance music is spreading myths. I wish I could tell, but I'm not aware of a publicly available reference set. So how does it's detection rate compare with dance music? Octoat 3:20:00 PM EST beaTunes said. Feel free to google "beaTunes Camelot notation" to find more information about this topic.
BEATUNES KEY ACCURACY LICENSE
It then displays this information in their proper musical name and also in the Open Key Notation, a number based format.īeaTunes does not display the key information in Camelot notation, because the inventor of that notation requires other companies to license that particular notation. Jat 12:15:00 PM EST beaTunes said.īeaTunes detects keys, not letters, not numbers. Hi is there a way to, instead of having beatunes detect key in letters, have it detect it in numbers such as 8b or 9A, etc.
It appears to me that a p-value therefore does not make any sense. And the actual probability of any of the algorithms delivering the correct result (i.e. Stevie, besides this blog post not being a scientific paper, I'm not sure you understand the nature of this graph and the experiment it describes. what's your p value there? :o) Jat 8:40:00 AM EST beaTunes said. Jat 5:19:00 AM EST The Mekong Riverkeeper said. That said, in internal testing b2 performed pretty much as well as MIK41 on the Beatles testset, i.e. Only then you can make meaningful statements about accuracy of either version. Seriously, the comparison with b2 will be useless unless you also compare against a reference dataset (i.e. No, I will wait for someone qualified :) Jat 5:13:00 AM EST beaTunes said.
BEATUNES KEY ACCURACY FULL
Jat 7:44:00 AM EST beaTunes said.Īre you planning to conduct a full comparison? I will not. Waiting for full comparison before buying v3. Made small comparison between version 2 & 3: - difference is noticeable. I'm actually surprised none of the DJ sites/mags have picked this up yet. Things may look different with other test sets. It means that for the Beatles test set, beaTunes 3 with online resources turned off performs a lot better than MIK 4.1. Does it mean the key detection of beaTunes is significant better than the key detection of MIK? Jat 10:30:00 AM EST beaTunes said.
0 kommentar(er)
